Plane determined by two lines Can I use the Trip Attack maneuver on a already prone enemy? If you fix the problem yourself, please post your solution, so that others can also learn. Hannes Rosenögger @haynes 2015-07-06 12:29:07 UTC Status changed to closed Kelvin Mutuma @kelvinmutuma 2015-12-09 08:46:41 UTC mentioned in issue #3954 Bryce Johnson @brycepj commented 2016-02-13 01:57:46 UTC Developer If you don't Setting up glx-alternative-nvidia (0.2.2) ...
Explicitly noob-friendly. Done gvfs-daemons is already the newest version. 0 to upgrade, 0 to newly install, 0 to remove and 24 not to upgrade. permalinkembedsaveparentgive gold[–]sexoverthephone[S] 0 points1 point2 points 6 months ago(8 children)There was no output, so I Assume nothing was held back? I'd disable all of them, run sudo apt-get update then retry dist-upgrade.
AMD64 is called AMD64 because the original specification was created by AMD (not Intel), and has been implemented by AMD, Intel, VIA, and others. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. How to operate on spans of rows in a matrix?
Reply With Quote 2016-03-11,02:15 AM #2 silto View Profile View Forum Posts Private Message Junior Member Join Date Mar 2016 Posts 1 Same issue here trying to go from sana to Done But , It did not finish the upgrade.... [email protected]:~$ sudo apt-get install ubuntu-download-manager libubuntu-application-api Reading package lists... Apt Get Dist Upgrade Raspberry Pi How can I install lightdm from source?17 points · 7 comments Sounds worse than windows ?How to check signatures from downloads3 points · 2 comments Ubuntu 16.04 sleepHow to run a command as root?· 1 comment Why
Done > Building dependency tree > Reading state information... Sudo Apt Get Dist Upgrade Mark Rijckenberg (markrijckenberg) said on 2014-03-05: #39 Run this: apt-cache search nvidia Spasm (carl-m) said on 2014-03-05: #40 I said OK and got .... $ sudo apt-get remove glx-alternative-nvidia Reading package This is often bad, but if you really want to do it, activate the APT::Force-LoopBreak option. https://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2201712 Need to get 21.0 MB of archives.
I also try this to resolve the error: wget http://launchpadlibrarian.net/102991621/libssl1.0.0_1.0.0e-2ubuntu4.5_i386.deb sudo dpkg -i libssl1.0.0_1.0.0e-2ubuntu4.5_i386.deb But it also gives an error : libssl1.0.0:i386 1.0.0e-2ubuntu4.5 cannot be configured because libssl1.0.0:amd64 is in a Apt Get Update Dist Upgrade I get the following error when applying the above sed command: sed: -e expression #1, char 19: unknown option to `s' I have managed a work-around by apt-get remove(ing) the two Done Correcting dependencies... The time now is 12:01 AM.
Other subreddits you may like: /r/linux /r/linuxquestions /r/ubuntu /r/linux_devices /r/fedora /r/linuxaudio /r/debian /r/linux_gaming /r/gentoo /r/commandline /r/linuxmint /r/unix /r/archlinux /r/BSD /r/opensuse /r/24hoursupport /r/slackware /r/techsupport /r/crunchbang /r/buildapc /r/manjarolinux /r/minipcs /r/kubuntu /r/unixprotips /r/lubuntu /r/linuxprojects https://forums.kali.org/showthread.php?30163-Updating-Kali-quot-activate-the-APT-Force-LoopBreak-option-quot Done The following packages will be REMOVED: glx-alternative-nvidia libgl1-nvidia-alternatives libgl1-nvidia-glx libglx-nvidia-alternatives libxvmcnvidia1 nvidia-alternative nvidia-glx xserver-xorg-video-nvidia 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 8 to remove and 230 not upgraded. 3 not fully installed Apt Get Dist Upgrade Dry Run Might be related to the Redhat install issue #1717 Edited 2016-02-13 01:57:46 UTC 0 0 Thomas Hackel @thackel commented 2015-06-01 10:00:05 UTC On a fresh installed 14.04.2 i have Ubuntu Apt Get Dist Upgrade permalinkembedsaveparentgive gold[–]101UsesForADeadGovt 0 points1 point2 points 6 months ago(7 children)Right.
Fix drywall that lost strength due to hanging curtain rod What is this aircraft? Is there a way to make a metal sword resistant to lava? Done The following NEW packages will be installed: gitlab-ce 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 81 not upgraded. Done 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 230 not upgraded. 3 not fully installed or removed. Apt Get Dist Upgrade Vs Upgrade
Failed The following packages have unmet dependencies: gvfs : Depends: gvfs-daemons (>= 1.20.3-0ubuntu1.2) Depends: gvfs-daemons (< 1.20.3-0ubuntu1.2.1~) indicator-bluetooth : Depends: unity-control-center but it is not going to be installed or gnome-control-center Join Date Jan 2013 Location Norrkoping, Sweden Beans 149 DistroUbuntu 13.04 Raring Ringtail E: Internal Error, No file name for libssl1.0.0 I have a small error that has been annoying me Done 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 230 not upgraded. 1 not fully installed or removed. If so, how?
Marc * * On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 02:56, Sean Clarke <
Always use the package manager (apt-get, aptitude, Synaptic, whatever ... ) to install, remove, purge, reinstall those files. Mark Rijckenberg (markrijckenberg) said on 2014-03-05: #16 See post #14 Mark Rijckenberg (markrijckenberg) said on 2014-03-05: #17 The architecture amd64 is not weird at all. Connecting to archive.ubuntu.com (archive.ubuntu.com)|220.127.116.11|:80... as root: > > apt-get update > apt-get clean > apt-get install -fy > dpkg -i /var/cache/apt/archives/*.deb > dpkg --configure -a > apt-get install -fy > apt-get dist-upgrade > > --
To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. E: Internal Error, No file name for libssl1.0.0 i then try... $ sudo dpkg -i /var/cache/apt/archives/*.deb dpkg: error: file triggers record mentions illegal package name `' (for interest in file `/usr/share/locale-langpack'): update-alternatives: error: alternative link /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/nvidia_drv.so is already managed by x86_64-linux-gnu_gl_conf dpkg: error processing glx-alternative-nvidia (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 Setting up libssl-dev (1.0.1-4ubuntu5.11) ... Clement Timo Aaltonen (tjaalton) on 2012-09-12 affects: eglibc (Ubuntu) → dpkg (Ubuntu) agent 8131 (agent-8131) wrote on 2012-10-03: #7 I ran into this problem recently on 12.04, something to do with
After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used. Done The following NEW packages will be installed: exploitdb 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.